Cit vs surinder pal anand
WebJan 4, 1994 · v. Surinder Pal Anand . ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This appeal has been filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, “the Act” … Webi) CIT v/s Surinder Pal Anand, Surinder Pal Anand, [2011] 242 CTR 0061 (P&H HC) Assessment being made under s. 44AD, the assessee was not under obligation to explain individual entry of cash deposit in the bank unless such entry had no nexus with the gross receipts and therefore no addition under s. 68 was called for.
Cit vs surinder pal anand
Did you know?
WebMar 28, 2024 · Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii vs Gurinder Pal Singh on 25 March, 2013. Section 260 in The Income- Tax Act, 1995. ... placed reliance on a decision rendered by Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of CIT v. Surinder Pal Anand [(2011) 242 CTR 61, wherein it was held as follows: “8.Once under the special provision, exemption from ... WebThe Commissioner Of Income Tax vs S M Anand on 23 August, 2024. Author: S.Sujatha And N.K.Sudhindrarao. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI …
WebJan 8, 2024 · The Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264 held that once under special provision of section 44AD … WebIn the application, the four aforesaid daughters were also mentioned against column 3. Inder Pal, the respondent, it appears, was a nominee under the policy; Yogesh Kumar, …
WebThe Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264), under identical circumstances had held as follows'.- 8 I.T.A. No. 451/Coch/2024 "7. Section 44AD of the Act was inserted by the Finance Act, 1994 with effect from 1-4-1994. Webdecision of Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT Vs Surinder Pal Anand 192 Taxmann 264 and submitted that once the return of income is filed U/s 44AD of the Act, the turnover declared by the assessee cannot be doubted. The assessee is not required to explain each
WebJan 30, 2024 · i) CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264 (P&H HC) ii) Nand Lal Popli vs. DCIT [ITA1161&1162/Chd/2013 dt. 14/06/2016] Accordingly the addition of Rs. 27,94,306/- u/s. 68/69A was directed to be deleted. The view full text of the judgment: Click here --------------------------------- Summarized by: CA. Shashank A. Mehta
WebAfter relying upon a judgment of this Court in CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand (2010) 48 DTR 135 (P&H), the Commissioner allowed the assessee's appeal and ordered deletion of the amount of Rs. 18,31,500/- as ordered to be added to his income by the assessing officer. biomechic hip jointWebThe Commissioner Of Income Tax vs P.V.Kalyanasundaram on 8 February, 2006. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 08/02/2006 Coram THE … daily record today\u0027s newsWebJan 3, 2024 · The findings of ld Revisional Authority cannot be sustained as the enquiry in to the relevant issues is duly reflected in the assessment proceedings and only because the ld Pr. CIT being a higher authority and more wiser in experience considered that enquiry in some other aspects would have resulted in different opinion, does not give … biomech insightWebMar 14, 2024 · Surinder Pal Anand 192 Taxman 264 for the preposition that once the exemption from maintaining books of account has been provided under the special provision and presumptive tax @ 8% has been made the basis for determining taxable income, the assessee was not under any obligation to explain individual entry of cash deposit in the … daily record top 100 women 2022WebJun 29, 2010 · Case: CIT Vs Surinder Pal Anand. High Court of Punjab (India) Judgment Cited in Precedent Map Related Vincent Judgment: Adarsh Kumar Goel, J. 1. daily record want adsWebPunjab and Haryana High court distinguished and overruled its own decision in CIT v. Surinder Pal Anand 48 DTR 135 in which cash deposited in bank was held from business itself. The provisions of presumptive taxation are enacted to facilitate computation of total income and filing of return of income. daily record wooster obituariesWebSep 19, 2024 · Punjab and Haryana High court distinguished and overruled its own decision in CIT Vs. Surinder Pal Anand 48 DTR 135 in which cash deposited in bank was held from business itself. biomechical tests for salmonella